Prettau Zirconia - Built To Last

Not All Zirconia Is The Same

What you should know about Zirconia quality in full-arch dental implants, and the questions you should ask your clinic.

Many clinics are starting to offer “Zirconia teeth.”. Which is a great thing for patients as it is the clinically proven most optimal long term prosthetic material for patients. If you want to learn more about how Zirconia compares to PMMA you can click here for a detailed breakdown.

However, very few explain which Zirconia they use, and what that means for you long term.

And that matters, because the quality of Zirconia directly affects real-world outcomes, including:

  • risk of fracture or failure
  • how well your teeth tolerate daily chewing forces
  • how predictable your long-term result will be

Two patients can both receive “Zirconia teeth”, and have very different experiences years later.

What Lower Quality Zirconia Can Mean for Patients

In full-arch implant treatment, your teeth are:

  • supporting the force of your entire bite
  • connected across a long span
  • exposed to thousands of chewing cycles every day

When lower-grade or inappropriate Zirconia is used for full-arch bridges, the risks increase.

That can mean:

  • Higher fracture risk over time
  • Reduced resistance to fatigue (micro-damage from repeated chewing)
  • A greater chance of needing repair or replacement
  • Less confidence biting into harder foods

These aren’t theoretical risks, they’re the practical consequences of using zirconia that prioritises appearance or cost over full-arch durability.

Why “Zirconia” Alone Isn’t Enough Information

Zirconia isn’t one material. In simple terms:

  • Some Zirconia's are stronger and more fracture-resistant
  • Others are more translucent but structurally weaker

In single crowns, that trade-off may be acceptable.

In full-arch bridges, it can be critical.

When strength is reduced, so is the margin for error.

This is why patients should be cautious of vague claims like:

“High-translucency Zirconia teeth”, “Premium Zirconia”, “Zirconia upgrade”

Without context, those phrases don’t tell you whether the material is actually appropriate for a full-arch implant bridge.

Why We Use Prettau® Zirconia

At New Life Teeth, our final full-arch bridges are fabricated using Prettau® Zirconia, produced by Zirkonzahn.

We use it because it is:

  • Engineered specifically for full-arch implant restorations
  • Designed to prioritise fracture resistance and long-term stability
  • Used in monolithic (single-piece) bridges to reduce failure points

In practical terms, this means:

  • A much lower likelihood of structural failure
  • Greater confidence chewing normally
  • A restoration designed to last, not just look good initially

Our focus is not on using the most translucent Zirconia, it’s on using the zirconia that delivers the most reliable long-term outcome for full-arch patients.

Simple Comparison: What This Means for You

Why You Should Question Your Clinic

This isn’t about distrust, it’s about making an informed decision.

If a clinic cannot clearly explain:

  • Which Zirconia they are using
  • Why it’s suitable for full-arch implants
  • What happens if it fractures years later

…then you’re being asked to accept uncertainty in a treatment that’s meant to last for life.

A simple question to ask any provider is:

“What Zirconia are you using for my final teeth, and why is it suitable for a full-arch bridge?”

A clinic confident in its materials will welcome that question.

The Takeaway

Zirconia can be an exceptional material for full-mouth dental implants, when the right Zirconia is used for the right reason.

Lower-quality or inappropriate zirconia increases the risk of fracture, fatigue, and long-term complications.

Higher-grade, full-arch–specific Zirconia improves predictability, durability, and confidence.

That difference matters, because your teeth aren’t temporary.

If you’d like, we’re happy to:

  • explain the Zirconia we use in plain terms
  • show real examples of completed full-arch bridges
  • answer any material-related questions openly

Book a Free Clinical Assessment

Additional Clinical Reading & Evidence

  • Bidra AS, Tischler M, Patch C. Survival of 2039 complete-arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: A retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(2):220–224 — Reports 99.3% survival at 5 years for monolithic zirconia bridges.
  • Vozzo LM, et al. The success and complications of complete-arch zirconia implant-retained prostheses. Materials (Basel). 2023 — Summarises outcomes and wear characteristics of monolithic zirconia.
  • Comparative in-vitro study: Monolithic zirconia exhibits less opposing tooth wear than layered zirconia surfaces.